Saturday, January 24, 2009

To peek or not to Peek...

I think all of us pregnant ladies are faced with this option. Do we decide to find out the gender of our baby or wait until they are born? There are pros to both.

If you peek you can prepare yourself, feel connected with the baby by calling it by it's gender such as "little fella" or "Sweetpea" as opposed to an "it", and the dreaded "What are we having?!" dilema will be resolved.

However I know people who choose to not find out until the baby is born and they seem to like that too. My sister enjoyed waiting, and I have a few cousins and friends who chose a similar route.

I guess I would hate it myself, as a peeker, if I tried and tried to find out what we were having at an ultrasound but they could never make a guess because the baby was never in the right position. (That happened to a friend of ours. They tried a few ultrasounds and never got a guess, so by the time they could have actually made a guess on the gender they only had to wait a month more so they decided just to wait until they were born.)

We will be getting an ultrasound as soon as our insurance goes through (which we are hoping comes sooner than later!) so in preperation for that 'choice' we will be making to either peek and find out what we are having - or wait, I thought I would post this article from a mom of three who explains her reasoning for 'peeking' and her reactions to those who choose not to peek. Enjoy.

Peeping Mom
by Megan Ault

Is it a boy or girl?

I peeked all three times I was pregnant. My lengthy résumé as a Peeker dates back to nursery school, when I organized the great underwear peek-off, held behind the corner paint easels. So it should come as no surprise that as an adult, while lying next to a picture of my unborn child on an ultrasound screen and being tended to by a technician who knows whether my fate is Barbies or Hot Wheels, I can’t bring myself to say, “We don’t want to know.”

In my own defense, there are sound reasons why I’ve peeked. While pregnant with my third and final child — with two young boys already — my husband and I sort of hoped I might have a girl. If Nicole turned out to be Nicholas, the ultrasound would give us some time to get excited about raising three boys. Which it did.

While pregnant with Connor, my second son, we decided to peek for his older brother, Dylan’s, sake. We figured that anything we could do to help Dylan prepare for the baby’s arrival would help him make the transition from being an only child to sharing our adoration with a sibling.

“Dylan, you’re going to have a baby brother!” I announced after the ultrasound.

“Where? Where is he? Can I see him?” he asked, lifting my shirt to expose my beach-ball belly. Clearly, there is a peeking gene.

Which takes me back to my pregnancy with my first son, Dylan. We peeked, of course. We peeked because I wanted to get the nursery ready ahead of time, which was really quite helpful. Well, OK. We peeked because I could not bear the suspense.

While we’re on the topic, I have a tiny issue to discuss. It’s about Non-Peekers. While chronic Peekers (like me) might express admiration for Non-Peekers’ resolve, in truth, they bug us. One of my best friends (a Non-Peeker!) said this when asked if one little look would kill her:

“I know how hard that last month of waiting will be, and reminding myself that I have such a wonderful surprise ahead will help get me through.” I find this a little bit show-offish. If we were little girls, I’d pull her hair. And the wonderful surprise part? The surprise is that most babies can squeeze out of such a normally small opening in the first place.

Being pregnant at the same time as a trusted friend and finding out she’s a Non-Peeker can test the friendship. That’s why I’ve come to realize that the only way for Peekers and Non-Peekers to remain friends is to be forthright about who they are and then see what shakes out.

So when faced with a Non-Peeker, I don’t waste time. I admit that I always peek at the last pages of a novel first and compulsively glance through newspaper headlines before reading the articles. I proudly tell them about the Christmas I was 10, when I expertly cut the taped ends on my gifts, then eased them out for a look before retaping them. When they hear this, they give me something completely unlike a peek; they give me a look. You know the kind.

Because Non-Peekers can be rather self-righteous, I never admit that the Christmas I was 10 was the worst. But I also never say that if I had their will, I’d do things the old-fashioned way, too, and wait to find out if it’s a boy or girl. That might imply that I’m ashamed of my peeking heritage, which has shaped my very being.

What I do tell them is this: If I could just quietly accompany them to their ultrasound appointment, I would promise not to tell them what I see.

What do you guys think? Are you a peeker or non-peeker? Leave comments!

(To read more info about the author Megan Ault at
www.minorcatastrophes.com)

2 comments:

Alan and Kiersten said...

what a great idea for a blog! i will love reading this even though i'm not pregnant again yet. :) personally i'm a peeker...i figure you either are surprised at what 18 weeks or so and then prepared or you're surprised at 40 weeks and unprepared or stressed. which is what i would be up until i found out the sex. ha ha. i think it's just my personality - i have to know.

Megan Ault Regnerus said...

Congrats on the birth of your daughter! I actually wrote this essay 11 years ago (discovered your post after checking to see what pops up under my name on Google)for Shape Fit Pregnancy magazine. Would love it if you'd be willing to add an author bio at the end to let people know that more of Megan Ault's writing about raising sons can be found at www.minorcatastrophes.com. My best to you and your family :)